المساعد الذكيجارٍ تحميل القصة…
ز
مرحبًا زائرBanu Hashim and Banu al-Muttalib withdrew to the Valley of Abu Talib, then the boycott Charter was annulled and they left the Valley
Quraysh united to boycott Banu Hashim and Banu al-Muttalib and confine them in the Valley (shi'b) of Abu Talib. The blockade lasted three years until some men of Quraysh worked to break the Charter (Sahifah), so the siege ended and Banu Hashim and Banu al-Muttalib came out of the valley.
ثلاث سنوات من المقاطعة، وكيف تصدّعت الصحيفة من داخل قريش.
Quraysh united to boycott Banu Hashim and Banu al-Muttalib and confine them in the Valley (shi'b) of Abu Talib. The blockade lasted three years until some men of Quraysh worked to break the Charter (Sahifah), so the siege ended and Banu Hashim and Banu al-Muttalib came out of the valley.
It represents a stage of severe trial followed by relief, and shows the steadfastness of Banu Hashim and Banu al-Muttalib and the support of some men of Quraysh for the truth in breaking the injustice.
And in this year: Banu Hashim ibn Abd Manaf withdrew, and their brothers Banu al-Muttalib ibn Abd Manaf followed them with Abu Talib to the Valley of Abu Talib. They stayed there for three years, until Al-Mut'im ibn Adi ibn Nawfal ibn Abd Manaf and Zam'ah ibn al-Aswad ibn Abd al-Muttalib ibn Asad worked to annul the Charter, and Banu Hashim and Banu al-Muttalib left the Valley in the late ninth year.
The meaning of the event is that Quraysh tried to pressure the Prophet ﷺ and those with him by boycotting Banu Hashim and Banu al-Muttalib and cutting off dealings with them. But Allah showed a sign in the Charter (Sahifah), then some men of Quraysh agreed to break it, and the boycott ended.
Before this event, Quraysh agreed to write the boycott charter and hang it inside the Kabah, then Banu Hashim and Banu al-Muttalib entered the valley and were besieged.
The intensity of Quraysh's hostility toward the Prophet ﷺ and those who supported him, and their attempt to force them to hand him over for killing.
The Muslims and Banu Hashim moved from a state of severe siege to leaving the valley and the end of the boycott.
It documents one of the harshest stages of the siege of the Prophet ﷺ and his family.
It shows the steadfastness of the call to Islam despite boycott and pressure.
It shows the failure of collective siege policy to silence the call to Islam.
It shows the effect of kinship and support in facing injustice.
It teaches patience and steadfastness in hardship.
It shows that injustice does not last and relief comes after trial.
It foiled one means of pressure against the Prophet ﷺ and his family.
Sheltered Banu Hashim and Banu al-Muttalib in the valley and protected the Prophet ﷺ
Worked to break the Charter (Sahifah)
Worked to break the Charter (Sahifah)
They entered the valley and endured the siege
They followed Banu Hashim to the valley and endured the siege
Allah's support for His servants appears even after a time.
Injustice is rejected even when it is a collective decision.
Kinship and family ties may be a reason for injustice to be lifted.
An alliance on falsehood may be broken by differences in conscience and truth.
The boycott was used as a tool of economic and living pressure.
Patience with certainty is a cause of steadfastness.
Collective decisions need justice, not abuse.
A society that approves injustice collapses morally.
An unjust boycott or collective pressure on a weak group.
Standing firm on the truth while seeking lawful means to lift injustice.
The importance of standing with the oppressed and not leaving them under siege.
Coercive policies may fail if they go against justice.
Patience and not giving up in hardship.
The modern event should not be measured by every historical detail.
The Prophetic context was a confrontation with a revealed call, while the modern one has different conditions and laws.
Collective pressure should not be used to impose injustice.
